Tuesday, March 28, 2006

Wrath and Fury

My fellow law students might be smart on paper, if that, but most of us don't seem to have much sense. I just witnessed a duo reminiscent of Beavis and Butthead actually point like fucking trained monkeys at the tv in the lounge and laugh at French protestors being sprayed with water and tear gas to disrupt their marches. Hello, stupid fuckers, that's real. Its not fucking WWF fake wrestling.

It brings to mind the critical question with which my generation will hopefully someday have to grapple in a serious manner. Our lives are fake, inside and out, but there are some things in the world that are real. Do we realize it?

Big Shout Out to my boy Law Student XIMINEZ

I came to school today completely soaked due to the rain pouring down on Austin. I sent out an email to my small group asking for anyone's dry clothes they could spare, and my boy Robert Jiminez gave me a much appreciated dry pair of sox and Lady De La Garza offered me a shirt I did not take her up on because I was not wet from the waist up. So, here's a big shout out to my people with the dry clothes...

Monday, March 27, 2006

Guantanamo Bay event at UT Law

Come to this event at the law school:


Thursday, April 6, 2006 4:30pm TNH Rm 3.142, UT Law School

Guantanamo: Law-Free Zone? A play reading and panel discussion on Guantanamo Bay Detainees

Sponsored by: American Constitution Society, Rapoport Center for Human Rights and Justice, National Lawyers Guild

Sunday, March 26, 2006

despair

A description of hell on earth:

http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2006/03/brothel_cambodia.html

What could be worse than this? And why is it that there is a vast ocean of difference between what is described here and my life, or yours?

What is more hellatious, the hell dimension in which everyone lives like this, or the hell dimension that we live in, in which most people live like this and a few live like us, and and all of us, us and them, make their lives even worse , as we are "helping them" and even "allowing them" to become like us and as they do what seems easy at the beginning to grab onto a peice of the life they see on the television?

And is it so great? The most evil characters in the peice above are the Westerners who are so sad and desperate to feel alive they have gone to Cambodia to do something incredibly depraved and incredibly harmful, just to shake off the mundanity, the mediocrity that's swollowed them.

The girls in this story... and the boys sold into labor... what is it to be like that? Maybe I've had a glimpse. To live and operate every day with that kind of pain and sense of hopelessness... you must become hard, like stone, sometimes even mean, and you have to become truly alone, disconnected from everyone else, and even yourself, like you are locked in a tiny dark room, and you can't see or hear anything at all, you can't see your hand in front of your face, so you stop being so sure that you exist. So, you don't feel it and it doesn't hurt, and it won't matter when you get strangled after you've passed your prime and the pedophiles don't want you anymore, or if you do make it past your teen years and maybe a child comes out of you, you won't need to pause and feel sympathy when it is your turn to sell her.

Saturday, March 25, 2006

VOTE FOR THE WEIRDO TICKET!

All right, maybe they wouldn't like to be called that, but I identify with them and I feel that all the freaks, geeks, weirdos, outcasts, and nerds, and maybe even some of the people that are really cool and popular but sometimes, when no one is looking, like to play with their Star Wars figures are going to identify with them too.

I'm talking about the upcoming Student Bar Association Elections, which will take place on March 29. If you are not a law student at UT, feel free to skip this post. See you next time.

I am not sure if there is anybody out there still reading this shit, or if has run its course and people have moved on, but I'm doing this anyway just to put it out there that law school does not have to be like fucking high school, or worse, and one way we can start working on changing it into a real academic, open atmosphere is to get some real people in SBA. Lets make SBA more than just bar review, yall.

So here are my picks, otherwise dubbed the weirdo ticket. I don't have picks on every single race, so if you want to leave a comment picking weirdos for races I haven't yet, please do so.

WEIRDO POWER! Lets do it spring 2006!

SBA President.... BRANDON CRISP

Vice President of Operations.....BRAD DOMANGUE

Vice President of Programming.....STEPHANIE HUI

Secretary.......SEAN GRIFFIN

State Bar of Texas Representative.......JOHN HRYHORCHUK

All right. This has left out the races for Permanent Class Agent and 2L Class Representative. I don't know any of the people running in these races, so if any weirdos out there who want to vouch for the weirdo cred of any of these people, leave me a comment. And, just to make it fair, if you recommend a candidate, it has to be apparent somewhere in your comment that you are a)not the candidate him/her self, and b) you are a weirdo yourself.

So, weirdos, lets exert our collective leverage and take our rightful place as an acknowledged block of people whose interests have to be accomodated at the law school. WEIRDO POWER!

Thursday, March 23, 2006

Online Meaningless Quizzes... MUCH better than writing my brief!!

Yeah baby! Check it out... it reaffirms how goddamn motherdy motherfuckin cool I am. This online quiz shows that I am a combination of Worf and Deanna Troi from Star Trek: The Next Generation. Worf is really cool and intimidating, and Troi is fucking hot and smart as hell. I remember watching that show even though I didn't like Star Trek stuff when I started watching it because Troi is so fucking hot. I was like 11 or something and I was slightly confused, but I didn't care. Damn, damn, damn... give me some of that hot premonition action baby!


Your results:
You are Worf
Worf
95%
Deanna Troi
95%
Mr. Scott
85%
Will Riker
80%
Spock
77%
Jean-Luc Picard
75%
James T. Kirk (Captain)
70%
Chekov
60%
Mr. Sulu
60%
Data
60%
Uhura
55%
Geordi LaForge
55%
An Expendable Character (Redshirt)
50%
Leonard McCoy (Bones)
45%
Beverly Crusher
15%

And... the Serenity Quiz!!! If you haven't seen this movie, and you like Jos Whedon, see it. It is Buffy in Space... it was fanfreakinmotherfuckintastic baby!

Again, it was a tie. This time between the captain, a really cool Han Solo/Warf type character, and River, the Buffy-type tough girl who is really psycho at the beginning of the movie as a result of the evil imperial government taking her captive and doing experiments on her. Again, pretty accurate... it makes me look cool. That's what matters. Not my brief, that's due in 12 hours.

Your results:
You are Malcolm Reynolds (Captain)

Malcolm Reynolds (Captain)
100%
River (Stowaway)
100%
Dr. Simon Tam (Ship Medic)
90%
Zoe Washburne (Second-in-command)
80%
Jayne Cobb (Mercenary)
70%
Derrial Book (Shepherd)
60%
A Reaver (Cannibal)
60%
Wash (Ship Pilot)
55%
Kaylee Frye (Ship Mechanic)
50%
Alliance
40%
Inara Serra (Companion)
25%
Honest and a defender of the innocent.
You sometimes make mistakes in judgment
but you are generally good and
would protect your crew from harm.
You are trained in the art of combat
and are usually intimidating.

Tuesday, March 21, 2006

South Park v. El Ron Hubbard

I laugh at South Park. I don't necessarily think that everyone should be watching it, since it does contain lots of backlash-ism and anyone who takes it seriously and is not smart enough to know better might internalize it. However, this furor over the Scientology episode is fantastic.

This episode is great. I just watched it, and I laughed my ass off. It takes aim not only at Scientology, a huge pyramid scheme in the form of a cult which sues people to defend itself instead of defending itself with good doctrine and practice, but at Tom Cruise's acting ("you're not as good at Leonardo DiCaprio" is genius) and rumored homosexuality, John Travolta's always articulate and well-thought out way of speaking, Nicole Kidman's chin, R. Kelly's spoken word/rock opera piece of shit sequence of "songs" known as "Trapped in the Closet", ideas of prophets coming back in young children's bodies (which could be construed as a veiled slap at Buddhism), new testaments (think Book of Mormon, a favorite target of TnM), the cult of celebrity in general, and, of course, Jews and Catholics.

The debate over Scientology has not exactly been at the forefront of the public mind, and I'm not suggesting it should be. However, it is always good when its brought up just enough for us to all remember what a fucking joke it is, just in case someday our defenses are down just enough that we might have gotten suckered into a "free personality test".

I can't fucking believe that Isaac Hayes is quitting over this. Dude, everyone knew you as that guy who sounds like Barry White who sung "Shaft" --until you became Chef. This is the dumbest move of your career.

Oh, and did I mention that I hate Scientology? I do. And I don't like Tom Cruise either. So sue me...

Hail Xenu!

watch the episode, or Xenu will freeze your soul and throw you in the volcanoes of Hawaii:
http://www.contemporaryinsanity.org/content/view/548/49/

Monday, March 20, 2006

self-medicating made obvious

Duh.

This is a classic case of cart before the horse-n, chicken before the egg-n.

From Schizophrenia. com

Overview:
Use of street drugs (especially marijuana/hash/cannabis) have been linked with significantly increased probability of developing schizophrenia.

This link has been documented in over 30 different scientific studies (studies done mostly in the UK, Australia and Sweden) over the past 20 years. In one example, a study interviewed 50,000 members of the Swedish Army about their drug consumption and followed up with them later in life. Those who were heavy consumers of cannabis at age 18 were over 600% more likely to be diagnosed with schizophrenia over the next 15 years than those did not take it.

Experts estimate that between 8% and 13% of all schizophrenia cases are linked to marijuna / cannabis use during teen years.

Bullshit. They start smoking to make the shit quiet down. Isn't that obvious? And doesn't it work, at least in the short term? What happens when you take their shit away from them? Do they start acting like schizos then? Should we be taking it away then? What's worse? Smoking weed or gettting hooked on fucking expensive, possibly dangerous psychoactive pharms? Fucking a, schizo.com... don't you know nothing?

Thursday, March 16, 2006

Carry on, youth of France!

The youth of France are striking on their university and high school campuses over a new proposed law that will allow workers under the age of 26 to be easily dismissed. Carry on...

http://www.libcom.org/blog/

Insight into South Dakota Legislature

This quote by SD State Senator Bill Napoli gives us a great insight into the minds of the legislature's motivation in banning abortion.

The quote validates the old notion that rape is worse when it "robs" a woman of her virginity; if a woman has already had sex, then rape won't be such a big deal to her- sex is sex, and women that have already had sex... well, can they really be raped anyway? Even if they are, do they really feel traumatized afterward? After all, it isn't the violation of a woman's body and her mind, the act of violence that is rape, after all... it is her virginity that matters. The rapist has robbed the future husband of his right to be the one to take the virginity and the right to impregnate, for the first time, his bride.

Another interesting thing about this quote is that you really get the sense that Napoli is fantasizing about the rape. He uses the word "savaged" and the phrase "sodomized as bad as you can possibly make it". He eroticizes the violence that the woman, the ideal dainty virgin dutifully saving herself for marriage, experiences as she is raped. Do normal people still use the word "savaged" to describe rape? What is it about rape that is so attractive? Let's assume Napoli has never raped a woman; what is it then about the rape that would be so erotic to him? If is not the violence inflicted upon the woman, could it be the moment after the rape when the woman, left powerless, violated, and helpless, needs a hero like Napoli to save her and make her whole again. The man plays the role of the benevolent master- she is not perfect anymore, but he loves her anyway and will look past the rape and lost virginity... but she is still a bad girl, and always will be now, so he can do things to her that he couldn't do to the woman who is still complete and untouched...

The following is a quote by South Dakota State Senator Bill Napoli on "The News Hour with Jin Lehrer" in which he explains when exceptions to the law banning abortions might be valid:

"A real-life description to me would be a rape victim, brutally raped, savaged. The girl was a virgin. She was religious. She planned on saving her virginity until she was married. She was brutalized and raped, sodomized as bad as you can possibly make it, and is impregnated. I mean, that girl could be so messed up, physically and psychologically, that carrying that child could very well threaten her life."

Sunday, March 12, 2006

Mexico Allows Abortions that South Dakota Now Will Not

Americans love to pride themselves on being more wise and modern than brown people world-wide. Well, Mexican law is more liberal on abortion than the new South Dakota law banning all abortions except those in which there is a serious threat to the life of the female incubator. However, that doesn't mean much in terms of human rights and liberty for women. Read on, and hope that this is not where our country is headed.

Mexico: Rape Victims Denied Legal AbortionProsecutors, Health Workers Intimidate Rape Victims With Insults, Threats
(Mexico City, March 7, 2006)

Mexican officials actively prevent rape victims from gaining access to legal and safe abortion, and they fail to punish rape and sexual violence inside and outside the family, said Human Rights Watch in a report released today.

The 92-page report, "The Second Assault: Obstructing Access to Legal Abortion after Rape in Mexico," details the disrespect, suspicion and apathy that pregnant rape victims encounter from public prosecutors and health workers. The report also exposes continuing and pervasive impunity for rape and other forms of sexual violence in states throughout Mexico.

"Pregnant rape victims are essentially assaulted twice," said Kenneth Roth, executive director of Human Rights Watch. "First by the perpetrators who raped them, and then by officials who ignore them, insult them and deny them a legal abortion."

In Mexico, abortion in general is illegal, but rape victims have the legal right to a safe abortion under all state criminal codes. However, women and girls who approach the authorities to exercise this right face multiple obstacles, Human Rights Watch found.

A number of agencies in various Mexican states – particularly the state attorney general’s office, public hospitals and family services – employ aggressive tactics to discourage and delay rape victims’ access to legal abortion. A social worker in Jalisco, for example, showed scientifically inaccurate anti-abortion videos to a 13-year-old girl who had been raped and impregnated by a family member. Some public prosecutors threatened rape victims with jail for procuring a legal abortion, and many doctors told women and girls, without cause, that an abortion would kill them.

As a result, many rape victims seek to resolve their situation by resorting to back-alley abortions that endanger their lives and health. Underage girls raped by their fathers or other family members often find themselves with no other alternative than to carry the imposed pregnancy to term.

"The Mexican government needs to ensure that rape victims do not have to endure dangerous back-alley abortions or imposed pregnancies." said Roth. "A public official who fails to inform rape victims of how they can obtain a voluntary legal abortion is contributing to a human rights violation and should be disciplined."

When abortion is criminalized, a number of human rights are threatened, including the rights to equality, nondiscrimination, life, health and physical integrity. Since 1994, U.N. human rights bodies have expressed particular concern with countries where access to abortion is restricted for pregnant victims of rape or incest. Human Rights Watch upholds the right of all women to decide independently about matters related to abortion without interference from the state or others.

According to Mexican government estimates, more than 120,000 women and girls are raped in Mexico each year. But government surveys also show that nearly 10 percent of Mexican women are victims of physical assaults each year. Worldwide, physical assaults against women include rape in 30 to 40 percent of the cases. This suggests that actual annual rape figures in Mexico could be more than 1 million a year.

Mexico’s legal framework does not adequately protect women and girls against sexual violence. Until recently, the Mexican Supreme Court held that rape between spouses was not a criminal offense if it serves some sort of reproductive purpose. This ruling was overturned by the court only in November. A number of states still do not criminalize domestic violence specifically, or only do so in cases of repeated violence.

Girls are even less protected than adult women under law. Most state penal codes in Mexico define incest as sex between parents and children or between siblings that is consensual, and they penalize the underage victim at the same level as the adult perpetrator.

Therefore, abortion is illegal in cases of pregnancy through incest, as defined by Mexican law, since the law defines incest as consensual sex, not rape. In most of Mexico, the age of consent for sexual activity is 12, and only in Mexico state is it over 14. This means that the crime of statutory rape in much of Mexico only applies to girls who in many cases are too young to become pregnant.

In theory, non-consensual sex between family members is penalized as rape. However, prosecutors do not always charge perpetrators of incest with rape, even where consent was clearly lacking or the victim was under the age of consent. In Guanajuato, for example, Human Rights Watch interviewed a woman who had been sexually abused by her father at least since the age of six – and who also faced criminal charges for "incest." She had two children as the result of these rapes.

"State laws on domestic and sexual violence fall significantly short of Mexico’s international human rights obligations," said Roth. "The definition of incest as voluntary sex is an insult to the thousands of girls who suffer abuse daily. No one, and least of all girls raped and impregnated by their fathers or brothers, should be forced to carry a pregnancy to term."

Selected testimony:

"Graciela Hernández" (victims’ names changed for protection), a 16-year-old girl in Guanajuato, was raped weekly for more than a year by her father. The official legal record from her complaint against her father in 2002 reads:

Then my father took me to a hostel.... He penetrated me, and it hurt a lot when he penetrated me. I cried and I said to my father that it hurt a lot.... I want to declare that I don’t want to have the child that I am expecting, because I will not be able to love it. Because it is my father’s, I will not be able to love it. (The authorities did not authorize a legal abortion.)

"Lidia Muñoz," a 25-year-old rape victim, was intimidated by medical personnel in a public hospital in Mexico City in 2005. An NGO representative who was present gave the following account:

When she got the authorization and went to the hospital to have the [abortion] done, the doctor in charge of her care said to her: ‘We are going to have many problems, because we are going to have to do a death certificate [for the aborted fetus]. You are going to have to bring a hearse, [and] to buy a coffin to take away the body, because we can’t have the body here.’

"Marta Espinosa," a 12-year-old pregnant rape victim in Yucatán was passed from one state agency to another when she tried to obtain a legal abortion. A social worker who physically accompanied her said:

It was a 12-year-old girl, she came from the rural part of the state.... The first doctor had seen her [when she was only] one month pregnant.... The next clinic at eight weeks.... When she came to Mérida [the capital of Yucatán], she was 12 weeks pregnant.... I went to social security, I went to [the public hospital]. I went to the offices of those in charge.... Everyone turned their back. They said: ‘It is not possible.’ I brought the article [of the state penal code] where it says that [abortion after rape] is within the provisions.... In the Family Services agency [where I worked] they wanted her to have the child by any means.... They said to me that she was many months pregnant now, and I said: ‘That’s because many months have gone by while you tell me no.’ (The authorities did not authorize a legal abortion.)

To view this document on the Human Rights Watch web site, please visit: http://hrw.org/english/docs/2006/02/23/mexico12712.htm

Saturday, March 11, 2006

Proof that right-wing Muslims and right-wing Christians are exactly the same

This report brings to my mind the stories I used to hear growing up in Oklahoma about the Baptist homes for "unwed mothers" that are sprinkled throughout the Bible Belt. They are basically private Baptist-run juvenile detention centers to which parents send their pregnant teenage daughters to ride out their pregnancies until the babies can be wrested away from them and given to adult Baptists to raise. When I was in college, a story broke about the righteous man who ran one of these homes in Florida. He was raping the girls regularly, and he had been doing it for years. Funny, he was also a local leader of an anti-abortion group.



Libya: Women, Girls Locked Up Indefinitely Without Charge‘Protective’ Facilities Serve as Places of Arbitrary Punishment

The Libyan government is arbitrarily detaining women and girls indefinitely in “social rehabilitation” facilities, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today. Officially portrayed as protective homes for women and girls “vulnerable to engaging in moral misconduct,” these facilities are de facto prisons.

The 40-page report, “A Threat to Society? Arbitrary Detention of Women and Girls for ‘Social Rehabilitation,’” (available online at: http://hrw-news-mideast.c.topica.com/maaexGUaboFu0a5QBpWb/ )documents numerous and serious human rights abuses that women and girls suffer in these facilities. These include violations of their rights to liberty, freedom of movement, personal dignity, privacy and due process.

Libyan authorities are holding many women and girls in these facilities who have committed no crime, or who have completed a sentence. Some are there for no reason other than that they were raped, and are now ostracized for staining their families’ “honor.” Officials transferred the majority of these women and girls to these facilities against their will, while those who came voluntarily did so because no genuine shelters for victims of violence exist in Libya.

“These facilities are far more punitive than protective,” said Farida Deif, Middle East and North Africa researcher for the Women’s Rights Division of Human Rights Watch and author of the report. “How can they be called shelters when most of the women and girls we interviewed told us they would escape if they could?”

“Social rehabilitation” facilities have a distinctly prison-like character. The women and girls sleep in locked quarters and are not allowed to leave the gates of the compound. The custodians sometimes subject them to long periods of solitary confinement, occasionally in handcuffs, for trivial reasons like “talking back.” They are tested for communicable diseases without their consent upon entry, and most are forced to endure invasive virginity examinations. Some residents are as young as 16, but authorities provide no education, except weekly religious instruction.

These women and girls have no opportunity to contest their confinement in a court of law, and typically have no legal representation. The exit requirements of “social rehabilitation” facilities are in themselves arbitrary and coercive. There is no way out unless a male relative takes custody of the woman or girl or she consents to marriage, often to a stranger who comes to the facility looking for a wife.

During meetings with Human Rights Watch in late January, the Libyan government promised to look into the abuses documented in the report. Aisha al-Qadhafi, daughter of Libyan leader Mu`ammar al-Qadhafi, also promised to investigate the matter. She presides over Wa’tassimu, a charity the government has charged with overseeing Tripoli’s “social rehabilitation” facilities. In late February, the managing director of the charity informed Human Rights Watch that the government just established a specialized council to study the conditions in all of Libya’s “social rehabilitation” facilities including examining the physical and psychological well-being of the women and children detained. It remains unclear who will be on the council and how it will function.

Human Rights Watch welcomes the establishment of the new council and calls on the council to investigate conditions in the centers first-hand and objectively document violations of Libyan law as a first step. Ultimately, the Libyan government should release all women and girls not serving criminal sentences who are nevertheless confined in these facilities and establish purely voluntary shelters for women and girls who are at risk of violence.

“Libya cannot use protection as an excuse to lock up women,” said Deif. “Women and girls who need protection from violence deserve genuine shelters, not punitive detention.”

Select testimonies from Libyan women held in the “social rehabilitation” homes featured in the report:

It is as if we’re criminals even though we didn’t do anything wrong. — A woman held at the Social Welfare Home for Women in Tajoura, Tripoli, May 4.

A man raped me on the street on August 8, 2004... I went directly to the center in Tarhouna, because my brother would kill me if he found out. I went directly from the center to the social welfare home. The prosecutor called my parents. He told them my story. They visit me but they won’t officially receive me. — A woman held at the Social Welfare Home for Women in Tajoura, Tripoli, May 4.

My mother died in a car crash when I was two. My father married a Moroccan woman. We didn’t understand each other. We had lots of problems. She’d hit and insult us. Eventually my father kicked me out. He gave me a ticket to visit my relatives. I worked in a restaurant. I made clean money. I didn’t smoke or take drugs. A year later, my father came to pick me up because people were talking. The prosecutor told me that I could either come here or go home with my father. — A woman held at the Social Welfare Home for Women in Tajoura, Tripoli, May 4.

Related MaterialLibya: Need to Deepen Rights ReformPress Release, January 25, 2006 http://hrw-news-mideast.c.topica.com/maaexGUaboFu1a5QBpWb/